"Two Weeks Ago I Saw a Tumor That Was 16 Centimeters in Size"

A pathologist discusses the disturbing increase in aggressive breast cancers

Nov 06, 2022

Dr. Ute Krüger, M.D., is a pathologist based in Sweden who has been doing cancer research for 25 years. A senior physician at Lund University, for the past 18 years she has specialized in breast cancer.

During the past year, Krüger said in an interview in July 2022, she has noticed a worrisome trend: She’s seeing a large increase in breast cancers in younger women. She said it is becoming more and more common to see women between the ages of 30 and 50 presenting with breast cancer.

Abnormally Large Breast Tumors

But that’s not all. In addition to seeing younger women—women born in the 1970s and 1980s—afflicted with breast cancer, Krüger is also seeing larger-than-normal cancerous growths in their breast tissue.

“The tumors seem to be larger than before,” Krüger explains. While seeing tumors that are as large as 3 cm in diameter (about 1.2 inches) used to be infrequent, now Krüger says she is seeing breast cancer tumors that are much, much larger.

“Tumors greater than 4 cm in size used to be rarities,” she said, “but I see these fairly often now. Tumors 8 cm [3 inches] in size are no longer rare, and even ones of 10 cm [4 inches] and 12 cm [4.7 inches] occur. Two weeks ago I saw a tumor that was 16 cm in size.”

A photo of cancerous breast tissue. The arrows point to cells that are actively dividing. Pathologist Dr. Ute Krüger, M.D., says she is seeing more breast cancer in younger patients and that some of these cancers are proliferating quickly in an unusually aggressive way.

Sixteen centimeters! That’s a 6.3-inch tumor. According to Krüger, this tumor had taken up the patient’s entire breast.

Krüger also said she is seeing multiple tumors in the same breast, as well as patients presenting with cancerous tumors in both breasts.

What’s more, these tumors are growing faster and more aggressively than she has seen in the past.

So What’s Going On?

We know that there has been a general upward trend in cancer in younger adults. Many scientists believe that this is because of increasing exposure to carcinogens in the food, air, and water. Of particular concern is the over-exposure to the herbicide glyphosate, the main ingredient in Roundup.

But Dr. Krüger says that she believes that this rise in aggressive breast cancers is linked to the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.

The temporal association between mRNA vaccines and cancer is not in dispute. Conventional doctors say, however, that it is just a coincidence. With so many people getting vaccinated, and cancer being a common disease, of course we will see a temporal association.

However, in her interview, Krüger insists that this is not just an unfortunate coincidence. She explains that she is now seeing patients who have lived with slow-growing breast cancer for years but shortly after vaccination their cancers have started growing and spreading throughout the body.

Krüger’s suspicion is that “vaccination against COVID-19 may be related to so-called turbo cancer.”

By What Mechanism?

When you have a hypothesis in biology—in this case that mRNA vaccines are causing dormant cancers to reactivate and slow-growing cancers to become aggressive—you also need a biologically plausible mechanism to explain the hypothesis.

In the second half of the interview, Krüger cites a scientific study published in the journal Viruses in October 2021 that posits that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein impairs DNA damage repair in vitro (meaning in test tubes.) That article, however, has since been retracted.

Enter a new study published in the prestigious journal Food and Chemical Toxicology. This study provides a biologically plausible mechanism by which vaccine-induced changes in the body may be causing impairment to the human immune system.

This fascinating and highly technical paper, “Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs,” was published in June of 2022. If you haven’t read it yet, I recommend that you do.

The paper was co-authored by a team of four preeminent scientists:

1. Dr. Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., a senior research scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and author of the book, Toxic Legacy. Full disclosure: Dr. Seneff and I have co-authored three articles: one in the Washington Post and two in the Epoch Times (which you can read here and here).

2. Dr. Peter McCullough, M.D., an internationally known cardiologist who has published over a hundred peer-reviewed articles during his 40-year career.

3. Dr. Anthony Kyriakopoulos, Ph.D., a clinical microbiologist, medical doctor, and researcher based in Greece whose expertise is in medical and molecular microbiology.

4. Dr. Greg Nigh, N.D., a naturopathic physician based in Portland, Oregon who is a prolific reader, researcher, and writer, according to his website.

This paper proposes that vaccine mRNA may “hide the mRNA from cellular defenses and promote a longer biological half-life and high production of spike protein.”

In doing so, these scientists hypothesize, mRNA vaccines may actually damage the body’s natural immune response.

They propose that this damage, which they categorize as “profound impairment,” comes about specifically because the spike protein interferes with an important early innate immune response mechanism, called the type I interferon response.

“Impaired type I IFN signaling is linked to many disease risks, most notably cancer,” the scientists write, “as type I IFN signaling suppresses proliferation of both viruses and cancer cells by arresting the cell cycle…” [my emphasis.]

If they are correct, injected synthetic mRNA may have a variety of negative consequences on human health, including making the body less able to control infections and suppress cancer.

“… I see so many cancer cases now. All the pathologists I have talked to recently are overworked,” Krüger said. “There are more tumor samples now than before.”

Ask the pathologists you know. Ask the funeral directors. Ask the flower shop owners who make floral arrangements for funerals. They are likely to tell you that business, unfortunately, is booming. You’re not imagining things. It seems that more people—especially young people—are dying than ever before.

We know, from data coming from Europe, that there is an excess death rate of over 1,000 deaths a week, in many countries in the industrialized world, since the roll-out of these vaccines, according to nurse educator John Campbell, Ph.D. The majority of these deaths cannot be attributed to COVID-19 infections, Campbell says. Instead, many are being attributed to cardiovascular issues and diabetes, according to The Telegraph.

We were told that vaccination would stop the spread of COVID-19 and also stop severe illness and deaths from the virus. We now know the vaccines do not stop transmission. It seems that fewer people are dying from COVID-19. But if all-cause mortality, aggressive cancers, myocarditis, and age-inappropriate deaths continue to rise, something is very, very wrong.

About the author: Jennifer Margulis, Ph.D., is an award-winning science journalist and mother of four. She earned her B.A. from Cornell University, her M.A. from the University of California at Berkeley, and her Ph.D. from Emory. A contributing writer at The Epoch Times, she is also the author/editor of eight books. Help support medical freedom, independent journalism, and vibrant, lifelong good health by becoming a paid subscriber to her Substack. Alternately, you can support her work directly via Venmo (“@Jennifer-Margulis-2”).