240 Comments
User's avatar
James Lyons-Weiler, PhD's avatar

There is not a single cause of autism. We should be doing studies that estimate objectively % liability, in the statistical sense, not the legal sense. See https://www.longdom.org/open-access-pdfs/autism-is-an-acquired-cellular-detoxification-deficiency-syndrome-with-heterogeneous-genetic-predisposition-2165-7890-1000224.pdf and https://ipaknowledge.org/ASD-Causality-Model.php

Expand full comment
Jennifer Margulis's avatar

Thank you for this link, Dr. Lyons-Weiler.

Expand full comment
Brandon is not your bro's avatar

That’s what I was taught years ago as an ob/ gyn doctor

Expand full comment
Jennifer Margulis's avatar

As an Ob-gyn, what do you think about the idea that acetaminophen is causing or catalyzing autism?

Expand full comment
Doc Smith's Jing Palace's avatar

There is not a single cause of anything, and every person with a diagnosis actually has a unique condition. Our medical model acknowledges neither of these facts which apply to every supposedly distinct disease brand.

Expand full comment
Tim Mackey MD MS's avatar

The rapid rise in autism seems to parallel the rise of metabolic syndrome in many countries. One wonders if cytokines and other inflammatory products associated with this cross the placental affecting neuronal development contributing to increases rates of autism.

Expand full comment
Dory O’Toole's avatar

Simply put I am in a continual state of cold anger this is just another example of the strangulation hold big Pharma has on everyone if it’s not hiding the data it’s the marketing of their products as Jack Kruse aptly stated “Marketing is legalized lying.” I remember when doctors were hesitant to give children and pregnant women any kind of medication. How far we have come from the BS if safe and effective. The criminals must pay when will people rise up and say enough is enough!

Expand full comment
Jennifer Margulis's avatar

I remember interviewing Lyn Redwood, an RN married to an MD (her husband, Tommy Redwood, is one of the best emergency room doctors in the state of Georgia) and she said this too, Dory. She said that when she was first practicing nursing, the very clear instructions were to try very hard to NOT give pregnant women any over-the-counter or prescription medications and **no** vaccines. Now we are basically forcing (or terrifying women into getting) 2 flu shots, 2 COVID vaccines, and a TdaP on pregnant women. Hoping that will change soon as the new head of HHS starts re-implementing the precautionary principle.

Expand full comment
Dory O’Toole's avatar

Thank you for your response Jennifer. It is surreal to me what has happened to nurses and doctors loss of common sense. Much less knowledge and oath to do no harm. Women comply to the no alcohol no sushi blah blah blah but they will roll their sleeve op or open the mouth and swallow big Pharma candy no questions asked ? I have concerns about the new head of HHS I was more hopeful a couple of months ago but I fear Big Pharma has a vice grip on Kennedy’s neck. Rumor has it they have dirt on him he doesn’t want revealed. Have you seen the latest interview with Mike Yeadon? It is an Odyssey Film it’s excellent I have been listening to Yeadon since the Scamdemic reared its tyrannical head. He has been a voice of reason in a grossly unreasonable sea of propaganda. Thank you for all you do to educate, inspire and knock on the doors of the minds of critical thinkers. Keep up the good work. Dory

Expand full comment
Leah Rose's avatar

RFK Jr.'s life has been an open book for decades and his 40 years actively working the 12 steps has oriented him to truth telling. So I wouldn't buy into the rumors about him being extorted into betraying his mission.

Bobby is a careful, meticulous lawyer and knows the facts will carry the day much better than an argument. He is moving at what feels like a snails pace to the many who had (unrealistic) expectations that he would go into HHS and go scorched earth, but he is laying the groundwork.

His plan, which he stated clearly for anyone listening, is to do the science that will expose the fraud and end it once and for all. If he can get to the compelling truth, the question of Pharma corruption becomes a blatant fact rather than a political argument, and it will change the tide of public opinion and thus of law-makers, who stand to be exposed as Pharma tools.

So everyone needs to take a breath and be patient. He is also under attack from all sides, Pharma and its big money cronies especially, so if MAGA can keep the faith and hold the line I think it would help hugely to take the pressure off him at least from our side. Let's give him some grace.

Expand full comment
MLisa's avatar

I've been surprised at the food companies' immediate action on food dyes. To me, it says that they have known all along about the dangers yet decided to keep being greedy by using cheap petroleum based dyes/flavorings in our food. They had the ability to change course years ago and they did for foreign counties purchasing their "food" products. Shameful!

Expand full comment
Bootsorourke's avatar

and there was a push against the food dyes back in the 70s. I was a child at the time, not eating froot Loops

Expand full comment
MLisa's avatar

I wasn't aware...I was born in 1964! We didn't have a lot cereal in our house and if we did, it was Corn Flakes, Puffed Wheat, Special K and sometimes Sugar Pops. My parents didn't have a lot of money to spend on junk/snack foods with having to feed our family of 6. Back then was probably the beginning of chemicals and dyes added to increase shelf life and improve appearance? If we could only go back to those times!

Expand full comment
Jennifer Margulis's avatar

They have certainly known. This EXCELLENT research came out in 2010 by the Center for Science in the Public Interest called "A Rainbow of Risks." That was 15 years ago and McDonald's in Europe had already removed red dyes from their strawberry milkshakes, whereas in America they continued to use red dye and "natural" flavors. Without pressure from consumers or the government, big business has no motivation to do things in a better, gentler, healthier way... Here's one site that still has the report. A quick search did not find it on CSPI. I don't know if they've updated it or taken it down... https://www.studocu.com/my/document/universiti-teknologi-mara/applied-sciences/food-dyes-rainbow-of-risks/51529273

Expand full comment
Joseph Kaplan's avatar

Big pharma is all out to destroy him. They have thousands even hundreds of thousands of bots all over the internet with fake AI generated negative messages about RFK. Try to ignore the fake news. Ignore the media. Listen and watch what he says and does. He is 100% on our side!

Expand full comment
KC & the Sunshine's avatar

Perfectly stated. Thank you. I’m constantly stunned at how quickly some people can turn and eat their own when the timeframe of action doesn’t fit their own.

Bobby truly is shouting at the tsunami from all sides. You are correct in saying he will march on with the facts rather than argue. The facts will expose the rotten underbelly once they are well and firmly

established.

Expand full comment
LoveIsCourage's avatar

With you on that 100% Leah. And frankly I think he’s operating in an extremely constraining environment of very darkened and dangerous conditions. I want everyone to pray Light dispels the darkness and make America healthy again prevail.

As for the doubters,

Straighten up and fly right people… use your imagination ffs After all we have seen of the willful maiming and killing what kind of territory do you think RFK is traveling in?? The man is our first and best chance for the sake of the children and the country which Autism alone will de$troy by 2035. That’s just a fact and you should NOT be surprised if you have NOT heard it on the fake news

Expand full comment
Bootsorourke's avatar

I agree

Expand full comment
M W's avatar

Bobby is absolutely not a careful, meticulous lawyer. Recently heard him present a favorable appellate court decision as though it was a trial decision. They’re too different arenas. He’s either incredibly sloppy or is ok with misleading a listener.

Don’t forget that he says that not a single vaccine has been through a double blind placebo clinical trial and thus “not proven safe and effective”. Yet, he had all of his children and family vaccinated. And thinks people should be able to “choose”.

Wouldn’t trust him at all.

Expand full comment
Scott Quigley's avatar

My understanding is Bobby has been a vaccine skeptic only since the early 2000s, his children were all grown up by them. It was Sarah Bridges whom came to Bobby's home with vaccine research and said she was not leaving until he read it was when his eyes were opened on this issue. Sarah Bridges had a son with autism and won a large settlement in vaccine court that the vaccine caused her son's autism. Yes, I believe he is correct in that all childhood vaccines have not been tested against an inert placebo such as saline, mostly against other vaccines or in the case of Gardasil, it was tested against the aluminum adjuvant. Bobby is in the system now and probably limited and what he can do.

Expand full comment
Leah Rose's avatar

People speak like that about court cases all the time when addressing a bigger picture. Especially in the arena of political battles. I don't think it says anything about his talent as a lawyer.

Regarding his vaccine choices versus his wholly accurate statement about no double blind, true (inert) placebo trials: he has always said he is not "anti-vax"—that was a smear by Pharma-controlled media to discredit him. He believes better studies need to be done to improve vaccine safety AND he believes vaccines are a useful public health tool AND he believes people should be free to decide whether to use them for their own or their children's health. His entire argument has always been centered on informed consent—making sure individuals have scientifically accurate, clear and full information from which to make decisions about their own/their kids health care. And now he's doing everything he can to make that possibility a reality.

Expand full comment
M W's avatar

No. Attorneys don’t usually speak sloppily like that. He was either sloppy or lying. I was a litigator. You know exactly what that case opinion means.

He should be anti-vax. If you say, not a single vaccine has passed a double blind placebo clinical trial and therefore, hasn’t been proven safe and effective, shouldn’t you be for taking all of the vaccines off the market until they’ve passed a double blind placebo clinical trial?

That would only make sense.

How can you not be “anti” what they’re injecting children with?

If you aren’t, you lack critical thinking skills, logic, and common sense.

Expand full comment
Katherine's avatar

🎯

Expand full comment
Rob2112's avatar

Um, Acetaminophen is OTC. Can’t blame pharma on this one…fraid it lands squarely on the medical estab.

Expand full comment
Crash Pile's avatar

It was a prescription drug in 1950 and eventually became OTC but that doesn’t exclude it from being a pharmaceutical product.

Expand full comment
Rob2112's avatar

So, pharma pushes MDs to prescribe Tylenol (and not generic acetaminophen) as prophylaxis prior to the administration of a vaccine? And this makes pharma a ton of money?

Expand full comment
Crash Pile's avatar

Acetaminophen is a $11B global market growing at 4% per year, 33% of that market is in the US. In the US there were 5.5 million prescriptions issued in 2022. Leading players operating in the global acetaminophen market are Abbott, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [Johnson & Johnson], Bristol-Myers Squibb and Company, Cardinal Health Inc., Viatris, Procter & Gamble Company, Sanofi, Novartis AG, Bayer AG, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Perrigo Company, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Glaxo SmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. So, yes “pharma” makes a ton of money on this product, both prescribed and OTC.

Expand full comment
LoveIsCourage's avatar

Pharma pushes toxic and dangerous vaccines. This one potentially spiking a dangerous fever so add Tylenol! In the practice of what’s come to be called functional medicine these days myself and colleagues knew over 30 years ago how and why this would be extremely ill advised. We would expect the potential for harmful interactions

Expand full comment
Bootsorourke's avatar

Pharma makes OTC drugs too.

Bad ones, like Tums which is associated with the Macular Degeneration upswing.

Expand full comment
Laura Kasner's avatar

Jennifer - kinda confirms my belief that this is intentional for the purposes of depopulation.

I am very hopeful that Bobby will implement much needed changes. 🙏🙏🙏

Expand full comment
Tom C's avatar

Get help.

Expand full comment
Bill Bradford's avatar

If you don't believe that there *IS* a so-called "depopulation agenda", then you're beyond help....

Expand full comment
sn0tbubb1e's avatar

Get help.

Expand full comment
JUDY BISTANY's avatar

When did we begin to believe that taking anything during pregnancy was safe? I refused to take even an aspirin (my children were born in 1984 & 1987) - did not drink coffee or alcohol. And would not get near anything that smelled like a toxic fume.

Expand full comment
Jennifer Margulis's avatar

Seems like common sense, doesn't it Judy, to avoid chemicals and noxious fumes and any medicine that is not a real food (or derived from real foods) during pregnancy? It's amazing how direct-to-consumer advertising coupled with doctor's office endorsements can derail common sense and throw the precautionary principle out the window.

Expand full comment
JUDY BISTANY's avatar

Common sense - the operative word .........where did it go?! or did it just get replaced with indoctrination? hmmmm........did you notice the "doc" in there? thanks again for a wonderful piece ....certainly something to think about ....

Expand full comment
Elle's avatar

I also hopes he looks into vaccines as a cause for autism. It might turn out to be "multiple" causes but it sure would be nice if we could find out if a vaccinated child ALSO received Tylenol or if the mom ever had Tylenol when she was pregnant. Could it be the combination of both Tylenol and Vaccines?

Expand full comment
Jennifer Margulis's avatar

I asked him about vaccines during the interview, and vaccine-induced autism is a topic Dr. William Parker and I have also discussed at length. In order for acetaminophen to do damage, there has to be oxidative stress. Vaccines CAUSE oxidative stress. As do wild illnesses. This, to me, strongly suggests that vaccines are an important piece of the puzzle. As we discuss in the book, "The Vaccine-Friendly Plan," Tylenol + vaccines + glyphosate = autism, over and over and over again... Also, if you give NO vaccines then chances are your child is much much less likely to need Tylenol...

Expand full comment
Zfbvsbo's avatar

It literally lists ASD as a potential side effect on virtually ALL vax inserts. The insert ones that are difficult to get a hold of now.

Oxidative stress from the toxic poisonous adjuvants and aborted foetal cells are a recipe for a myriad of immune decimating disorders which we’re seeing an explosion of today.

The paracetamols (and also antibiotic) overuse are implicated for sure.

Expand full comment
Carol Brizzolara's avatar

Tylenol depletes glutathione in the liver…here is an article on that and what it means!

https://drgreenmom.com/taking-tylenol-the-glutathione-liver/

Expand full comment
Bootsorourke's avatar

I was talking to a friend on the phone in the 80s and she was drinking an after-work glass of wine and took a Tylenol too.

Crash! Had to get an ambulance to her.

She had to go to hospital because that is not a happy combination.

Expand full comment
Jennifer Margulis's avatar

The number one reason for acute liver failure at the emergency rooms is inadvertent overdosing on Tylenol or what the scientific literature calls "acetaminophen toxicity." Just taking one double dose can lead to liver failure. It sounds like that may be what happened to your friend. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441917/#:~:text=Acetaminophen%20toxicity%20is%20the%20second,annually%20in%20the%20United%20States.

Expand full comment
Bootsorourke's avatar

The doctor told her alcohol and Tylenol can kill together.

Perhaps alcohol boosts the Tylenol and acts like an overdose?

Expand full comment
OPTION X's avatar

low glutathione also worsens asthma making the link you provided a good tool for fighting asthma. also my suspicion is that asthma is caused by vaccines, possibly via anaphylaxis or …?

Expand full comment
Bootsorourke's avatar

excellent point. I was loathe to use Tylenol because too much can damage the liver.

Even more so now.

Expand full comment
Donna Delikat's avatar

I have a daughter with profound autism, ID and epilepsy, I never took Tylenol or any medications during pregnancy, and even though the pediatrician recommended Tylenol following vaccinations, I never once gave it. This was late 1990s when I did not know how much thimerosal she was being injected with. So in our case, Tylenol had zero to do with it.

Expand full comment
Afi Koman's avatar

Did your daughter get prenatal ultrasound? How many did she have? I have studied this extensively, and I see a strong correlation. The cases of autism exploded in the early 1990’s. To find a cause for autism we need to find something which wasn’t used much before then. Tylenol can’t be the culprit, not by itself.

The allowed energy levels of prenatal ultrasounds were substantially increased in 1992.

Before 1992, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had limits for ultrasound output, with fetal applications limited to 94 mW/cm². In 1992, at the request of manufacturers and users, the FDA changed this limit to 720 mW/cm² for most applications, including fetal scanning. This represented an almost eight-fold increase in the allowed intensity for fetal examinations. The accepted frequency of doing ultrasounds also increased for one per pregnancy to at least 3.

Patients are told ultrasound is harmless, but it isn’t. It can be used to treat brain tumors, because it destroys brain cells, although a much higher dose is used.

Expand full comment
Jennifer Margulis's avatar

Afi Koman (I think this is a pen name? I like it!), I'm very interested in this as well. I devoted a chapter of my book, "Your Baby, Your Way," to the dangers of routine ultrasounds. There are many reasons NOT to get any ultrasounds, including the very real possibility that they are a contributing factor to abnormal neurodevelopment.

Expand full comment
Afi Koman's avatar

I am an MD PhD, retired cancer researcher with time on my hands. I did a thorough AI aided research to find causative factors related to the increased autism epidemic. I used increasing incidence starting in the early 90’s as a screening tool. This eliminated many of the usual suspects, like thimerosol, and eliminated most but not all vaccines. The factor that jumped out at me was increased use of more powerful ultrasound machines. The timeline is right, there is an animal model of autism that can be triggered by prenatal ultrasound, there is solid science showing ultrasound damages brain tissue but at much higher doses than prenatal ultrasound. My problem is I need access to direct clinical data, like how many ultrasounds did autistic children get versus non autistic children. If you can give me a solution to this, we can be coauthors. And Afi Koman is not my name. (My hospital staff limit what a doctor can say in public without institutional permission, so as not to embarrass the place,or get it involved in litigation. )

Expand full comment
Zfbvsbo's avatar

This is very interesting!

Perhaps coupled with ALL toxic poisonous adjuvants and aborted foetal cells that are contained within ALL vaccines (with or without thiomersal) is a recipe of toxic overload and immune decimating raft of ailments- all that are listed as potential side effects in the (now not easy to find fine print) vaxx inserts. So, one could ‘charge’ the other.

And one of the ways to verify this is to see what vaxxes or other drugs they were issuing to pregnant mums at the time. I am RH Neg A and they gave me that dreaded Rhogum injection. My own health deteriorated for years afterwards, and my daughter had vax side effects coupled with breastfeeding of mercury laden Rhogum. She suffered and I suffered. It was a nightmare the time. I found out years later that the Rhogam shot has one of the highest levels of mercury of them all.

The allopathic drug industry is a dark industry.

Expand full comment
Donna Delikat's avatar

Late 90s so both my girls only got one ultrasound. Btw, 15 months apart, my first daughter did not get 4 thimerosal DTP/HIb and no autism, second did, same schedule, different shots and manufacturers. Same environment, same full term normal healthy pregnancies I had no medical conditions, I was normal weight. No c-section. Both went home from hospital in 24 hours, perfect Apgar scores. Nothing different except the vaccines they got.

Expand full comment
Afi Koman's avatar

Thanks for responding, your experience is very helpful. You make a strong case for a vaccine link, specifically the multi dose Hemophilus influenza B (HIB) regimen. Thimerosal itself is not the answer, its use in pediatric vaccines was stopped in 2001, yet autism continued. But the 2,4,6 month Hib vaccine dosing started in 1990- 1991. Autism diagnosis started to increase dramatically after that. My own research shows a link between increased strength and frequency of prenatal ultrasounds and autism, which also increased around that time. To determine the cause we need to ask, what changed in that time period.

Expand full comment
Sammie's avatar

The FDA makes sure the ingredients in regular medicines are tested for safety before they’re allowed to be used.

But for vaccines, the rules are different: except for checking for some unwanted proteins, the individual ingredients (like aluminum) don’t have to go through the same thorough safety testing.

Some research has looked at how much aluminum kids can safely handle. These studies suggest that the amount of aluminum babies get from vaccines might be more than those safe levels. That could mean babies are getting repeated doses of aluminum that might be risky, either right away (acute) or over a long time (chronic).

In other words, this raises concerns that the current vaccine schedules might give infants more aluminum than some studies say is safe, and the regulatory system doesn’t require detailed safety testing of aluminum by itself in vaccines.

Expand full comment
Afi Koman's avatar

I just did some preliminary searches on Aluminum in vaccines, and you are correct. Although dietary aluminum is far greater than vaccine aluminum dosage, very little of orally ingested aluminum is absorbed but 100 percent of injected aluminum ( vaccine) is absorbed. And the number of vaccines recommended increased dramatically during the early 90’s. And circulating aluminum binds to transferrin and thus readily crosses the blood brain barrier. So vaccine aluminum is a major cause of brain aluminum exposure in young children, and aluminum is a potential cause of our autism epidemic. Thanks for pointing this out.

Expand full comment
Zfbvsbo's avatar

It’s not just the aluminium- it’s the aborted foetal cells (Diploid) and the formaldehyde, and blood brain barrier opening adjuvants. They’re deemed biologics so therefore skip double blind placebo testing. No one has ever tested for compounding escalating schedule series of culminative shots with young babies and children. It is a very dark industry and creates 'customers' for life with a raft of ailments which in reality are side effects of the multiple jabs.

Expand full comment
Sammie's avatar

Vaccines on the Childhood Schedule That Contain Aluminum

Vaccine Contains Aluminum? Type of Aluminum U.S. Introduction Year

Hepatitis B (HepB) ✅ Yes Aluminum hydroxide 1981 (routine for infants since 1991)

DTaP (Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis) ✅ Yes Aluminum phosphate or hydroxide (depends on brand) 1996 (replaced older DTP)

Hib (Haemophilus influenzae type b) ✅ Some brands PedvaxHIB contains aluminum; ActHIB does not 1987

Pneumococcal Conjugate (PCV13 / PCV15 / PCV20) ✅ Yes Aluminum phosphate PCV7: 2000, PCV13: 2010, PCV15/20: more recent (2021–2023)

Hepatitis A (HepA) ✅ Yes Aluminum hydroxide 1996

HPV (Human Papillomavirus – Gardasil 9) ✅ Yes Amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate (AAHS) 2006 (original); Gardasil 9: 2014

Tdap (booster for teens and adults) ✅ Yes Aluminum phosphate 2005

Meningococcal Conjugate (MenACWY – Menveo, MenQuadfi) ✅ Some brands Yes – aluminum phosphate in Menveo/MenQuadfi; Menactra is aluminum-free 2005 (Menactra)

Expand full comment
Sammie's avatar

Just asked AI about any vaccines that still contain it......"The influenza vaccine is recommended annually starting at 6 months of age. It’s included on the CDC’s childhood immunization schedule.

The schedule does not specify which brand or formulation to use — it leaves that decision to providers, based on availability, age, and health conditions.

Flu Vaccines That Still May Contain Thimerosal

These usually come in multi-dose vials, which use thimerosal as a preservative to prevent contamination between uses.

Common brands and formulations:

Fluzone (Sanofi Pasteur) – Multi-dose vial version

Afluria (Seqirus) – Multi-dose vial version

FluLaval (GlaxoSmithKline) – Multi-dose vial version"

Expand full comment
Sammie's avatar

Inadequate Testing: Regulatory Oversight and Safety Testing

The FDA requires safety testing of constituent ingredients in drugs. However, with the exception of extraneous proteins, no component safety testing is required for vaccines or vaccine schedules. Some studies have estimated pediatric safe dose levels of aluminum, suggesting that current vaccine schedules may exceed these levels, potentially placing infants at risk of acute, repeated, and possibly chronic exposures.

Expand full comment
Sammie's avatar

What about Aluminum in vaccines?

Expand full comment
Elle's avatar

Those are the kind of stories we need. I don't believe that everyone that had their child vaccinated, gave Tylenol but we need these stories to put the pieces together! Thanks for sharing...

Expand full comment
Jennifer Margulis's avatar

I agree with you, Elle. And it's also more than possible that parents who did not give their children Tylenol have children who were exposed to it -- by a babysitter, a well-meaning grandparent, a daycare provider. It's so ubiquitous that it's hard to know. Will just one dose "cause" autism? Some researchers say yes. I think that may be a way of looking the other way about vaccine-induced autism, but it's something to keep in mind. Another story that might resonate with you, Elle: https://jennifermargulis.net/vaccines-tylenol-cause-autism/

Expand full comment
Michael Framson's avatar

Don't know if your daughter got the DTP or the DTaP, but the DTP had an undisclosed ingredient--amorphous aluminium hydroxyphosphate sulfate--in addition to thimerosal. I believe it was Levi Quackenbush, who wrote an article regarding AAHS in the DTP back in 2017.

Expand full comment
Donna Delikat's avatar

From today’s CHD TV. here's new things happening right now. THIMEROSAL in vaccines may contribute to autism

00:11:50 - 00:11:56

severity. This is a new analysis, the first peer reviewed study to systematically track trends in

00:11:56 - 00:12:03

the rates of intellectual disability, defined as an IQ of less than 70among children with autism.

00:12:03 - 00:12:09

Found that those rates have risen and fallen in association with the presence of thimerosal

00:12:09 - 00:12:15

vaccines recommended to children and pregnant women. Polly, it takes a minute to study this graph

00:12:15 - 00:12:22

that Dr. Cindy Nevison put together, but this is a devastating graph and what it really shows is

00:12:22 - 00:12:29

when they did take thimerosal out of all childhood vaccines in the early 2000s, and they didn't have

00:12:29 - 00:12:37

it in the flu shots, there was a marked decline in intellectual disability among children who had

00:12:37 - 00:12:46

autism. Then, for reasons that are unclear, in 2004, the CDC decides to recommend flu shots to

00:12:46 - 00:12:53

pregnant women that had thimerosal and to recommend them to babies at 6 months. And most of those in

00:12:53 - 00:13:00

the early 2000s contained thimerosal. So then what you see is this incline of the children with

00:13:00 - 00:13:06

autism with intellectual disability. And I want to read you. Nevison said, you know, when she really

00:13:06 - 00:13:11

looked at this, she was just stunned. And one of the saddest things about this is back before 2000,

00:13:11 - 00:13:18

it was a minority of black and Hispanic kids who had intellectual disability. But a lot of those

00:13:18 - 00:13:23

kids are on Medicaid, and so the rate among them has increased substantially. But I want to read

00:13:23 - 00:13:28

this quote from our senior scientist, Carl Yablonowski, because I think it's so good. He said, our

00:13:28 - 00:13:33

struggles with thimerosal are a testament to how much we've lost our sensibility when it comes to

00:13:33 - 00:13:39

vaccines and their ingredients. We were crazy to include it, crazy to defend its inclusion and crazy

00:13:39 - 00:13:46

to recognize the hazard and remove it from only some. And that is so true. It's like, what were they

00:13:46 - 00:13:52

thinking, Polly? And to me, it's very, very frankly suspicious and incriminating that they took it

00:13:52 - 00:13:59

out of routine shots and then they put it to flu shots and recommended them to children. That is

00:13:59 - 00:14:05

very, very suspicious. And the graph that Cindy Nevison put together is also very, very deeply

00:14:05 - 00:14:11

concerning. It is. And also aluminum in those shots that cause. Well, of course, aluminum is also a

00:14:11 - 00:14:15

huge toxin.

Expand full comment
Michael Framson's avatar

In the Simpson Wood transcript, one of the attendees specifically mentioned the huge science-data safety unknown is the synergy between thimerosal and aluminum which is likely additive, meaning the two together are more toxic than each by themselves.

Expand full comment
Donna Delikat's avatar

It does explain why some are more severely autistic than others. It’s Russian roulette based on combinations of ingredients, timing and possibly a genetic factor which makes it harder to detox. Some vaccines were more toxic than others. My girls are the perfect example, same schedule, same pediatrician, less than 2 years apart, but completely different vaccines. I didn’t realize until years later when I got the records with the manufacturers and lot numbers. Up until then I just assumed they got the same vaccines. Nope.

Expand full comment
Michael Framson's avatar

The things we wished we had known. Truth hits like a ton of bricks.

Expand full comment
Laurie Adamson Alzheimer's's avatar

If you’re interested in the link between vaccines and autism, look up aluminum being used as an adjuvant in vaccines. There is a very strong link. The good news is the aluminum can be removed safely from the body by drinking silica rich mineral water. The number of aluminum containing vaccines has increased significantly over the past few decades.

Expand full comment
OPTION X's avatar

can you explain more about silica rich water?

silica as SiO2 is the main ingredient in sand.

Expand full comment
KKB's avatar

Look up the various writings of Chris Exley, on his silica detox protocol. He is arguably the world’s leading expert on aluminium. He has also helped thousands of young people injured by the Gardasil vaccine to clear the injurious aluminium so they can begin to recover. https://drchristopherexley.substack.com/p/frequently-answered-questions

Expand full comment
Jennifer Margulis's avatar

Dr. Christopher Exley discusses this in his book, "Imagine You Are an Aluminum Atom: Discussions With Mr. Aluminum." Here's a referred link to Amazon to read more about it. And entire books have been written about silica-rich water as well: https://amzn.to/4eELxVa

Expand full comment
Laurie Adamson Alzheimer's's avatar

The form of silica found in mineral water is orthostatic acid (OSA). KKB has mentioned Chris Exley, who writes on sub stack has done a great deal of research in this regard. Here is a link to my husband‘s and my website. You will find a list of silica waters that have enough silica to remove aluminum. You will also find information on autism and aluminum. https://prevent-alzheimers-autism-stroke.com/

Expand full comment
Laurie Adamson Alzheimer's's avatar

Here is the chapter on aluminum and autism from one of my husband‘s Silica Water book. (Dennis N Crouse. https://prevent-alzheimers-autism-stroke.blogspot.com/2019/02/autism-chapter-from-silica-water-secret.html?m=1

Expand full comment
Zfbvsbo's avatar

thankyou :)

Expand full comment
OPTION X's avatar

many thanks, a very interesting topic to investigate!

Expand full comment
OPTION X's avatar

it just blows my mind that a simple piece of information, given in seconds, can totally change the life of an unhealthy child (and parents).

all along i thought Fiji water was just a rich person’s fad.

Expand full comment
Laurie Adamson Alzheimer's's avatar

I am so pleased to hear this information was helpful to you. Thank you for letting me know. Our bodies were designed to use silica to protect us from aluminum. Some plants sequester silica to protect themselves from aluminum. Unfortunately we are being exposed to more aluminum than decades ago as well as our diets are not as rich in silica.

Expand full comment
Zfbvsbo's avatar

Its also the vert rapid escalating Vaxx schedule increasing. My daughters are 28/30 and they had only around 12/16 jabs. Now it’s over 80 :(

Clearly not about health but about profits and creating customers for life who can then be 'treated' with other drugs. A business model.

Expand full comment
Meghan Bell's avatar

It's the combination of Tylenol and vaccines. Studies have found that when kids are given Tylenol before or after vaccination they are significantly more likely to develop autism than if they are given another painkiller or none at all. Tylenol depletes glutathione, which impairs detoxification from the vaccines.

Expand full comment
Jennifer Margulis's avatar

I've linked to some of these studies in the article above. If you have others to share, Meghan, I'd be grateful.

Expand full comment
Meghan Bell's avatar

I'm guessing we looked at the same studies -- I didn't check out your sources while I read. Sorry I don't have time to reread right now but did you look into the class action lawsuit against Tylenol?

Expand full comment
Jennifer Margulis's avatar

A note to commentators: If you feel the need to leave nasty anti-Jewish or anti-Israel sentiments in the comments, you will no longer be welcome to participate in this discussion. I'd like to respectfully suggest that we all try to remember that ad hominem attacks, and blanket statements against groups of people, do not move the conversation forward. I'd also like to point out, as others have, that "autism" is an umbrella term. Neurodiversity is something to celebrate, not stop. However, severe autism, categorized by being unable to communicate, read, participate in this discussion, toilet oneself, or live independently, confers a life expectancy of half the national average. Perhaps we need a separate term for environmentally induced brain damage. As Dr. Jonathan Rose, father of two young adult children with autism, points out in this article, severe autism is very different from neurodiversity. https://jennifermargulis.substack.com/p/its-time-to-change-the-public-discourse

Expand full comment
Doug Thorburn's avatar

Because it was use so heavily since the mid-50s, acetaminophen by itself does not explain the massive increase in autism rates since 1986 and, more so, over the last ten-fifteen years. While the combo may increase the negative efficacy of vaccines, I suggest vaccines are the primary cause.

Expand full comment
Afi Koman's avatar

You have hit the nail on the head. Autism rates exploded in the early 90’s. We need to ask what changed then. When looking at cause and effect, start with the timeline. This applies to both law and medicine. You can’t accuse someone of a murder that happened before the accused was born. Likewise if I give my patient a new drug, and they get a rash a few days later, it was probably from the drug. The timeline of autism increase is where we should first look for answers.

Expand full comment
Katherine's avatar

🎯

Expand full comment
Anna B's avatar

One in 3 prematurely born babies eventually receive an autism diagnosis. My son(autistic) & grandson (not autistic) were both preemies. Because of this statistic (that had been 1 in 4), the big HMO created a special program to follow every prematurely born child for the first 2 years to monitor for autism and provide therapies. Those in charge were aware of toxins, triggers, inflammation etc. Is Tylenol causing UGR, placenta previa, miscarried twin, midline defects & other types of problems connected to prematurely born children? These problems can happen to moms who don't detox readily.. Tylenol could be a factor for some but I can't see it as a main 🐢 all the way down.

Expand full comment
Jennifer Margulis's avatar

Excellent question and observation, Anna B. I hope Dr. Goldberg or Dr. Parker will have time to reply to this. I think we have a huge problem with over-exposure to toxins. Acetaminophen is one. Antibiotics are another. And, of course, the toxins in vaccines, which include aluminum. The meningitis B vaccine contains: aluminum hydroxide, sodium chloride, histidine, sucrose, kanamycin. Some of these ingredients, including sucrose (because it's not organic and likely contains glyphosate) are extremely concerning...

Expand full comment
Jennifer Margulis's avatar

Anna B, I also wanted to share this article with you. If you have time to read it, I think it will resonate: https://jennifermargulis.net/three-toxins-to-avoid-three-things-to-embrace-during-pregnancy/

Expand full comment
Scaler Wave's avatar

"40 years ago when I started my practice, only 1 in 10,000 children had autism.  Today it's 1 in 100.  What is the only difference we have seen?  The inordinate number of vaccines that are being given to children today.  My partners and I have over 35,000 patients who have never been vaccinated.  You know how many cases of autism we have seen?  ZERO, ZERO.  I have made this statement for over 40 years: ' NO VACCINES, NO AUTISM'. "

Dr Mayer Eisenstein, MD

Expand full comment
Jennifer Margulis's avatar

In Ireland they're saying it is now 1 in 20 school-aged children have this diagnosis. Put differently, approximately 5% of school children in Ireland have autism. These numbers are mindbogglingly high. And the mainstream media wants us to be afraid of chickenpox...

Expand full comment
LINDA SODERBERG's avatar

My 1984 son and 2003 granddaughter both changed behaviorly after their four month shots.

They were both extremely happy infants until then. My granddaughter's reaction finally answered my question.

My granddaughter is the daughter of my daughter.

Expand full comment
Jennifer Margulis's avatar

I'm so sorry. Wondering, also, if they ever did genetic testing. When you have the MTHFR mutations you are much more susceptible to toxins like acetaminophen and the ingredients (especially aluminum) in the vaccines...

Expand full comment
mrjest@fastmail.com's avatar

Again, a knockout article, Jennifer! How can the MD's keep a straight face any more? They just do no care at all. Okay, not all of them. Only about 99%.

Expand full comment
Penny Olson's avatar

Has he done an observational study of his own practice by having his pregnant women not use acetaminophen/paracetamol and monitoring the rate of autism in the children after that

Expand full comment
Jennifer Margulis's avatar

I don't know but I will ask Dr. Goldberg, or he may be chime in here. It would have to be retrospective. One idea is that he counsel women before they become pregnant about the dangers and monitor them while pregnant to make sure they take no Tylenol and then compare X number of these outcomes to women from his practice who took Tylenol. I also don't know if the N will be large enough to be statistically significant.

Expand full comment
janice's avatar

Of course not. But he would still need to do the hard work of comparing his statistics with those of the general population, and I doubt he had. Speculation is easier.

Expand full comment
Lee HammMX's avatar

"This protocol has not been adopted in the United States."

"Goldberg, too, is sure that this protocol is the smoking gun."

So how does he explain the exponential growth of autism in the US?

Expand full comment
Hilary Butler's avatar

I started writing about paracetamol ( acetaminophen) ain the1990s, and much of that is on Beyond conformity, including the Pfizer incident with me in 2005, when I publicly pointed out that if children with meningitis were given acetaminophen, they had more serious outcomes…. Because Pfizer manufacture “PAMOL” in this country (The NZ version of Tylenol, or acetaminophen), and it was considered a HERITAGE drug ( GRAS) they decided to initiate legal proceedings against me, which didn’t go quite as they thought it would so they hurriedly flipped PAMOL on to Johnson & Johnson.

https://www.beyondconformity.co.nz/hilary-s-desk/how_big_pharma_stacks_the_deck_against_any_lawsuits

Parents in New Zealand have myopically used paracetamol for everything, since the 60’s. “Mother’s little helper” used after accidents, to put babies to sleep, or even if they are behaving badly.

Tylenol / PAMOL / acetaminophen, shuts kids up. And parents consider it as safe as water.

There are many media articles admonishing NZ parents over the decades, for the abuse of acetaminophen, and I have many website posts on my website discussed the dangers of acetaminophen in all its aspects, particularly regarding the immune system

The Bexsero protocol is just the latest one.

The New Zealand MoH has always advocated acetaminophen before and after vaccines lonnnnggggg before that. It became standard practice, because the old whole cell pertussis vaccine could throw huge fevers and discomfort.

The Israeli doctor says it’s not the vaccines that cause autism. . Just acetaminophen. Really? Does it not occur to him that there could be SOMETHING about the combination of a vaccine, and acetaminophen, - which down regulates an arm of the immune system, which in some children TURNS the vaccine into an immunological bullet?

If autism was solely caused by tylenol / acetaminophen, then --- because parents have used acetaminophen for so many things all the time, in the past, quite apart from vaccines, we would see random initiation of autism.

We wouldn't see the numbers of parents saying, "My child was fine until you gave him that vaccine."

Tylenol is the money making holy grail of drug manufacturers, so of course they will go for him for daring to question a 75 year old profitable substance. Now, if he ever did finger vaccines, imagine how much worse it would be for him.

The irony is, that he fingered acetaminophen to try to sanctify vaccines, and didn’t expect to be gas lit about acetaminophen. Perhaps this will result in a real wake up call for him. Either that, or he will be “Thompsoned”.

Expand full comment
Laura Christine's avatar

I recently was 'cautioned' at work about causing distress to clients by telling them this as well as other information about acetaminophen. The brainwashing is deeply effective unfortunately.

Expand full comment
EK MtnTime's avatar

I still believe “vaccines” are the cause of all kinds of issues children are coming up with that children didn’t have when I was a child 45-50 years ago. The “vaccine” schedule for children is a ludicrous number of unnecessary injections and risks. The “vaccine” schedule today compared to the schedule 40 years ago is staggeringly different and if you guessed it is because of money you would be correct. Thankfully, there is some talk about reducing the number of “vaccinations” but I’m fairly certain it’s not going to go anywhere when so much money changing hands with doctors and Big Pharma.

Tylenol and the generic are definitely bad things. It is a toxin which should be banned. For evidence of this see Dr. Yoho’s article about just that:

https://open.substack.com/pub/robertyoho/p/320-tylenol-is-a-pharma-atrocity?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Expand full comment
Rhianna Wassell's avatar

It is clear to anyone who does a modicum of research that the cause of autism is environmental. I don't think it is accurate, though, to say paracetamol is THE cause if autism. Just as AIDS is a condition that can be caused by a number and combination of various environmental factors, so to is autism. I think, ultimately. we will find that there are many different causative agents that lead to an immune system dysregulation affecting brain development.

Expand full comment
Chali’s Food for Thought.'s avatar

In my humble opinion the medical profession should think hard and use some humility whilst doing so. With successive generations doctors have interfered more and more with an otherwise perfect human body, each birth a wonder of creation.

The rates of childhood disease have skyrocketed since the introduction of a vaccine schedule that defies all common sense. Doctors should stop just blindly accepting every new drug that Big Pharma comes up with and instead use some independent and conscientious thought as to whether the majority of them are necessary.

The policy is to vaccinate to prevent a possible infection while at the same time completely disregarding the innate immune system that we are born with.

Why would a baby be at risk of hepatitis B, a sexually transmitted disease ? So why are they vaccinating the child ? There are multiple examples of similar inasanities.

Dont be bribed by an industry who pushes fear. Stick to your conscience. And parents take note.

Expand full comment
Andrea Hoffmann's avatar

I thoroughly agree, which is why I delayed and split up doses for my kids. I had that luxury— others do not. We shouldn’t have to deep dive into medical research to protect our kids—what are doctors for then?

Expand full comment
Chali’s Food for Thought.'s avatar

When I was a child in the UK, there was only the polio vaccine which was taken on a lump of sugar and one other which I dont remember. I have five children of my own, all adult now (30’s and 40’s) and I limited the vaccines and made sure they all caught chickenpox, measles and mumps which their immune systems dealt with swiftly enough. Today I would go so far as to refuse vaccines altogether. I believe RFK Jr is on the right track and might ban them altogether. It is such a profitable business Big Pharma will not like it but my question is: how the hell did we not notice the schedule grow in a generation from just a few to what we have now (US 72 by the age of 6 and UK 58). The very worrying discovery is that it seems none if them have been properly tried and tested. It is criminally insane and only considers the bottom line profit for these vaccine manufacturers.

Expand full comment