READ the REAL ANTHONY FAUCI by RFK, Jr. LISTEN to him speak on his CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE blog! YOU can decide for yourself whether he has any sense. Don’t just parrot what you hear ABOUT him. Listen TO him, and consider whether he is well read, knowledgeable, well educated, has a terrific staff to back him up, well travelled and aware of the issues he presents. SURELY you know a KENNEDY has had every advantage as far as education, travel, money, excellent mentors (well, for the most part…) and all of that? Look at his trial record as far as how many cases he has won. What all has he done for kids, for people in general, for the earth?!
I’m no democrat— but this is one democrat I’ve come to adore. (Sorry to lay it on so thick but he does get trash talked for no good reason. )
This makes me physically ill in knowing that we are feeding kids this junk. I am not a fan of public schools for a plethora of reasons, and this is just another example of how they continue to fail children.
Having served in Africa years ago, there wasn’t a lot of money and yet we spent time ensuring kids would receive proper nutrition and the highest quality we could afford. That was the priority of people in charge who deeply cared and as a result they selected the best for the kids. Shouldn’t this be the expectation for the country that basically leads the world?
This is a systemic symptom of a very sick system. The government is absolutely accountable for the chemicals they have continued to permit in foods. Those in leadership positions should be ashamed. The lunches they approve for children are a trickle down of the gross failure they continue to operate under.
How do we change this? I mean really change this? I’ve been reading articles like this for years. I’ve seen lunches they serve in Europe and my heart breaks in knowing that children here have to eat this ‘garbage’. It is time parents demanded better for their children, our future!
Another idea: Stop vaxxing pets so much. There are REAMS of proof showing injection-site tumors, skyrocketing upticks in cancers and autoimmune diseases in pets and livestock (just like humans!) and all sorts of issues at least in part due to the chemical toxins in vax. White coats say it’s fine but OTHER white coats say it isn’t. YOUR job as a pet and livestock owner is to listen to BOTH and decide FOR YOURSELF which white coat seems better read, better researched and better informed of the actual vaccine issues.
In the meantime, guess which animals never have injection site tumors, a huge uptick in cancers (or none at all), a huge uptick in autoimmune diseases? The wild ones we DON’T vaccinate. Kids and animals do NOT need the level chemical
of toxins, heavy metals, aluminum, and polysorbate 80, which breaches the BLOOD BRAIN BARRIER and carrie’s in other chemicals from the shots, like mercury. Breaching the BBB is seldom a good idea. openvaers.com
It's in find condition, but thank you for your unkind concern. It shows the sort of person you are far more clearly than if you'd tried to refute the evidence I've shown.
Of course, IF you can, please do. I'm happy to admit when I'm wrong. Unlike NGOs that want to push a narrative.
It isn’t that I don’t care. I’m heartbroken for all the people who didn’t research, and swallowed the BOUGHT and paid for main stream misleadia. It’s sad and heartbreaking, literally and emotionally. Hearts are truly BROKEN. I have this on hood authority from a heart nurse T a prestigious hospital near me. She’s never seen anything like it— all the younger men coming in with OLD MAN heart problems. ALL vaxxed, the more times, the worse it is. She’s had a dozen drop dead playing sports, playing video games! Their moms in there, bawling, their twin brothers or friends in there worried sick— again, literally. It’s BAD. The all cause mortality charts clearly show that deaths have gone through the roof in all age groups, especially the 18-50+ year olds, presumably the ones most likely to have been pushed to get the clot shots for work.
So I DO feel bad for you but I am a girl who calls a spade a spade. Best to know now, if you aren’t a bot, and you’ve had the vax, the more you e had, the more
likely
you are to suffer myocarditis or peri. Either way, your life expectancy is shorter than it was prior to the clot shots. But by all means, spend that shortened life telling me how openvaers.com is useless.
How, in the name of computer programming do you think you could have a conversation in this sort of detail with some AI? I co-wrote a book about this in 2015 and everything we predicted then has come true and the claims we debunked then are still debunked and demonstrably so too now.
Have you ever interacted with a bot? I have - many, many times. They give themselves away in subtle ways although they are getting better.
Writing and debunking the sort of nonsense here has been a mission for me for over a decade now. I don't even have to hide behind the name of a band. You can find me easily enough and have a conversation outside of the closed walls of this lunacy.
Come talk with the professionals I work with - many of them virologists, medical doctors, cancer specialists and so on.
I don't know how old you are, but I know that I owe my life to vaccines and in all likelihood, so do you. My RHR is in the high 50s and my BP is normal but that's because I have an active lifestyle. I need it to flush all the crap I have to sift through on sites like this.
You call a spade a spade? Really? Do you know what Dunning-Kruger syndrome is? You're demonstrating a clear and present case of it right now and you're nearing the peak in a sort of Sisyphean fashion.
Like I said, I'm easy to find on Twitter and Facebook but beware if you come after me there, you'd better come prepared because we don't take prisoners where bad information is presented.
That's how Seneff and many others have had their accounts removed or restricted.
America is full to the brim with young men showing old man issues -because you're almost all clinically obese and in most cases morbid or super morbidly obese. Those things destroy your body far faster than a vaccine can. Of course, if you know anything at all about human biology (in particular that lipid cells produce inflammation markers (adipocytokines) that play havoc with our bodies.
The thing is these things are (a) natural and (b) accepted as part of your right to eat until you're ready to burst. Those are the people most likely to die from C19. Or people with blood type A+ because (we, and I'm one of them) match the C19 attack vector more effectively.
But sure, go find a bot who can use words like that in context, and against your claims - one that doesn't need to use ad hominem to put you down.
Go on, I dare you - because if you can prove it, I'll print this page out and eat my own words on video.
I don’t think a huge uptick in “old man heart issues” from young men is on account being overweight. I seriously doubt weight has skyrocketed enough to move the needle this much. And if it had, wouid it not affect as many girls/young women? Would there not be roughly
equal amounts of skyrocketing myocarditis rates in girls/women? And would there not be equal numbers of athletes of both sexes dying on the files of play? This figure has gone up exponentially from roughly 17 per year to 600+. These are primarily very fit and athletic men. They are not sloppy fat nor trying to eat themselves to death. This figure is disconcerting.
You did not address the fact that VAERS is an instrument of the CDC/FDA. You’re far more concerned with whether a bit can be as articulate as you see yourself. Fine! You’re more
articulate than a bot, perhaps. I do not know nor do I care what all a bot may be capable of nor will I ever be, though my son is currently studying AI in college. I know next to nothing about any of its limitations though I’m sure he would be happy to fill me in.
Nonetheless, VAERS IS still a tool
of the CDC/FDA, and it is still somehwat used by them and they would still be crazy NOT to have any sort of tool for obtaining and learning from post-market vaccine data. It is still a huge need and a very insightful learning tool, even given its many flaws. It is not “rubbish”, as you claim. Nor is it needless. When vax have been recalled through the years, based on data— submitted by individuals OR doctors, it is important. It helps get late in the vax trials info to people with the power to make life or death situations less likely to cause more deaths. This “rubbish” was the reason one vax was pulled after killing “only” 53 people. It is very similar to England’s Yellow Card system. Other nations have similar tools/systems.
This begs the question, whether you think England’s and Germany/ and Denmark’s similar systems
are also rubbish or whether you just think ours in particular is rubbish? Either way, it doesn’t really matter, though in my estimation it matters quite a bit more than whether a bot can do backflips.
I don’t care enough one way or other who you are or what you’d like me
to prove, nor do I have an urge
to watch you eat anything on video.
No one here is “hiding behind a band”. My initials are KC and I like the sunshine. Your suppositions regarding me are off.
What else…?
Oh, I have a great number of
professionals, doctors, researchers, pharmacists, nurses, lawyers, statistical experts, authors, CDC whistleblowers, and vaccine injured children/people, their parents and friends, people who have an enormous amount of both professional and real life experience on this side of the fence. I am
not going to convince you, nor are you going to convince me. A spade is a spade and this is a waste of time and effort. Idk what “the powers that be” plan to blame the sudden uptick in all-cause mortality and actuarial charts showing all this death on, but I’m sure they’ll think of something. https://twitter.com/julianne_wiley/status/1567313697625841664
a more user friendly version if you simply want to access records rather than dive deeply into it or load (yet another) vax reaction into it:
It is a TOOL, an INSTRUMENT of the FDA/CDC for the purpose of seeing red flags not picked up during the primary testing and reactive phase of the trials. The reactions have led to the complete removal of “safe & effective” shots over the years on more than one occasion.
This is a smart tool, and frankly, if they DIDN’T have this tool in place, they would be idiots. They are a bunch of scam artists as it is but if they had ZERO post-market safety reporting / data gathering, there would be an outcry (from anyone with any sense) regarding why not.
Furthermore, they still USE this instrument— somewhat, so if you think it’s rubbish, you’ll need to take that up with them, or else figure out a better method of obtaining data from
post-market vaccine use and share your new method with them. I’m sure we’d all be grateful.
In the meantime, the results are in and it isn’t pretty. If YOU complied, and you aren’t a BOT, good luck.
I know what it is... which is why it's rubbish for people like you and the folks at OpenVAERS to use because you're not qualified to sift the data. You just pull a number out and go "OOOOOOOO!"
I know that the FDA uses it and you know what they've found? These vaccines have very low actual rates of adverse effects.
We know from Europe that the "monkey" based vaccine that the Russians stole to make Sputnik that there are a small number of people who got sick and some died from clotting effects. What's this? Am I admitting vaccination isn't perfect? YES, yes I am...
But those same people were at risk of exactly the same clotting events should they contract C19. Of course, people who weren't vaccinated often suffered the same fate.
I don't think it's rubbish as a tool for qualified data analysts, I think (and they've admitted themselves if you bother to read their about pages) that it was never designed for public use. That's the issue I have but where I come from the data isn't submitted in by the cook, the baker and the candlestick maker or the legion of people they get to submit false and misleading reports. I'd hazard a lot of them come from the Soviet Union and china.
Like many of these tools it's been weaponised and used against people like you who are simply too ignorant to know the wool has been pulled right over their entire head.
Greg Steube, a Republican U.S. Representative from Florida, sent the following letter to FDA Commissioner Robert M. Califf demanding full compliance with laws associated with the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting (VAERS) data. In particular, the FDA has not released their analysis of the VAERS data ordered by a Federal judge January 2022. Two other members of Congress - Rep. Michael Cloud (R-Texas) and Rep. Tom Tiffany (R-Wis.) also signed the letter.
A note on the VAERS system. VAERS is “the nation's early warning system that monitors the safety of vaccines after they are authorized or licensed for use by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).” Historically, VAERS is thought to under report adverse events. VAERS currently has over 1.4 million reports of adverse events after the administration of the COVID-19 vaccines.
since VAERS is run by the FDA and CDC, what would you propose they use instead to signal a problem with an injection. Why is this injection not approved by the FDA yet?
That's not the issue with VAERS per se. The problem is two-fold. One that any idiot can file a report (and yes, I mean fake ones) and the other is that most people are not data scientists.
People either use a raw count which is meaningless or find clusters which are also meaningless.
Actual random data can throw patterns and the trick is to know how to see the real patterns from the random ones. For example, recorded noise from outer space can, occasionally, produce sequences that sound like voices. But they're just noise that our brain interprets that way.
This is as much of an art as it is a science.
As for the FDA approval, I'm confused as to why doctors would be even allowed to dose a patient with a non-approved drug so perhaps you would care to elucidate on that point.
The mRNA injections by Pfizer, Janssen and Moderna are not approved by the FDA. They are authorized for emergency use (experimental). You should know the difference since you claim to be a science writer.
They just want us sick, tired, obese and barely alive. That’s it. That’s what they want. Anything delivered by any state agent or the establishment should be rejected wholesale.
Given the deeply entrenched criminality of the federal "regulatory" bureaucracy, it's probably going to be most effective to tackle this and a host of similar problems with all sorts of environmental toxins at the state level. Given the hold that the manufacturers and users of toxic chemicals generally, including Big Ag and Big Food, have over politicians in both major parties, it's probably going to require the kind of referenda that have been used in very many states now to override the DEA's classification of cannabis as a Schedule 1 drug when their bought-and-paid-for state legislatures refused to take action. Each state could simply make it illegal to sell any food that contains more than the miniscule level of glyphosate that can be found even in organically grown food due to unavoidable environmental pollution. It will be important to explicitly define "acceptable" levels of contamination within the law itself, because if that determination is left up to the entrenched state "health" bureaucracy, in most cases the numbers they come up with will be absurdly high, likely by orders of magnitude.
They're creating the generations of happy big pharma customers. These people are sick and evil. They have managed to poison everything, EVERYTHING! Without customers, big pharma can't not make $$$$.
I have not been able to consume anything with wheat or oats since 1997 apart from when I lived in Spain and only purchased from our local village bakery.
In UK I had been incorrectly diagnosed as Coeliac, but when my doctor in Spain ran the correct tests she found that I am not Coeliac and suggested that I may be reacting to glyphosate.
Upon returning to live in UK I was intrigued to find out that my MEP had volunteered to be tested for glyphosate and despite being a very careful vegan she tested positive for glyphosate and was really unimpressed.
Nothing ever came of it though.....
That company, Monsanto (now Bayer), needs to be forced to withdraw their product from the market but there is no political will to challenge Big P-Harma.
"All of the school lunch samples also contained heavy metals, some at levels up to 6,293 times higher than the EPA’s maximums allowed in drinking water."
Have you ANY idea the effect that cadmium, lead or other heavy elements have on the human body at that sort of exposure? ANY AT ALL?
Someone has been playing with the figures because just 10x EPA safe levels are enough to produce life-altering toxic effects in a foetus. 100x would likely result in death but it's been a while since I looked at the figures so I'd have to check.
As should you before you repeated such utter nonsense. I'm beginning to think America gives out PhDs in lucky bags. This is an utter disgrace.
"How do we get this poison out of the food supply?"
Here's a thought. Are you a plant Jennifer?
I mean if you are, I'd understand your concern. How about a bacteria? No.
OK then - so in that case glyphosate isn't toxic to you so why are you using inflated figures from a pressure group?
Would you like me to list some of the actual poisons in our food supply? Because I can and there are plenty of them but in most cases our bodies just simply don't absorb them due to the size of the molecules and the fact they are not broken down and just pass harmlessly through.
Those that do get through are filtered out by the kidneys - that's their job as you well know.
At least you would do if you had a degree in something related to human physiology. We know Zen Honeycutt, as pretty and charismatic as she is, doesn't.
The real poison in the world today is this sort of nonsense pushed by people with advanced degrees who should damn well know better!
No agency in the world has found a definitive connection between NHL and glyphosate. Suggestions yes, but there are other explanations and clearly you have zero clue about what you're spouting. As a journalist your readers deserve to hear facts, not something you dredged up from Moms Across America or Stefanie Seneff (who, similarly) is not qualified to opine on this and has been banned from Twitter. Presumably for her dangerous stances on vaccination.
Coffee is an endocrine disrupter. So is alcohol - so is lack of sleep for heaven's sake. How dare you come on the Internet, blow smoke in the air about your Ph.D and your other qualifications and then talk complete and utter nonsense.
If it were down to me (and you lived in a my area where this happens) you would likely lose your Ph.D and the right to call yourself doctor. Because we take this sort of stuff seriously, unlike your precious First Amendment that is actually tearing America apart at the seams now.
Now how does that feel? This is what's called an "Ad Hominem" attack (same as the one Mabal uses below).
I don't actually think you're an awful person, I don't know you. And even if you were John Wayne Gacey that wouldn't matter. What matters is the logic. If you argue that a wheel is round (in response to someone saying that it's square) then you'd be right. Even if you were the most despised person in the world, no one can really deny that the wheel is round. Or that the Earth is basically a very large sphere.
Now does what you said that attack the central point of my arguments? Do you have any evidence to suggest I'm paid (I'm not, but that's beside the point.)
Did you even read the arguments? You know that Jennifer's PhD is not a science doctorate right? And even if it was it would have to be in one of several fairly narrow fields.
I follow the e-v-i-d-e-n-c-e! I use multiple sources who I can verify are not NGOs and not in the pocket of Big Chem.
Jennifer's source has long been show to be faulty as MAA failed to detail the type of assay they used to detect the presence of glyphosate. I know this because I've been involved with this particular problem for, gosh, almost nine years now.
Now of course, if either of you wish to pick out and point of what I've said you take issue with, I'd be happy to discuss it. We don't have to wave our expertise around even though this is my field, I'm always happy to be corrected if I err on a point of fact.
One of my professors made an error (which I repeated, ugh) about the amount of CO2 released from a volcanic eruption some years back. I was rightly roasted and rapidly corrected that assertion.
That's the difference between a scientist and Joe Bloggs the Barfly.
"Jennifer's source has long been show to be faulty as MAA failed to detail the type of assay they used to detect the presence of glyphosate. I know this because I've been involved with this particular problem for, gosh, almost nine years now." - thank you. Now I see why you are so sneery. Your comments are bristling with ad hominem but you don't want us to notice that. Sorry, we did.
How is that ad hominem? Show me where I attack the person, not the argument. If I did that, then that's on me. But I find the repetition of results that are (a) wrong an (b) wouldn't matter even IF they were correct because like I've said, unless you are a plant or a bacterium, glyphosate has ZERO effect on our bodies. None. If we assail them with huge amounts over a large amount of time (say two teaspoons of prepared salt per day for two years) the equivalent of the rat study that's recently come out, the some will cross the blood brain barrier.
Jennifer's SOURCE. Not Jennifer and this is my wheelhouse.
My comments have numerous supporting studies, not that you would bother going to look them up. All that Jennifer and so many like her are doing is trying to cripple farmers across the Western world by pushing bad and faulty science. Even Farron Cousins recently went on a rant about earthworms when the study use nematodes which are not even closely related animals.
Why not go back to the source (Moms Across America) and examine their source. Ask to see the assay and the methodology used.
But what's REALLY glaring here is Jennifer is too cowardly to take ME on, so she simply relied on you guys to come and complain that I'm been mean.
Well yeah, I'm angry. I'm angry that my food costs more because of this sort of thing. I can hardly afford to eat as it is, but this sort of idiocy only benefits the rich.
READ the REAL ANTHONY FAUCI by RFK, Jr. LISTEN to him speak on his CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE blog! YOU can decide for yourself whether he has any sense. Don’t just parrot what you hear ABOUT him. Listen TO him, and consider whether he is well read, knowledgeable, well educated, has a terrific staff to back him up, well travelled and aware of the issues he presents. SURELY you know a KENNEDY has had every advantage as far as education, travel, money, excellent mentors (well, for the most part…) and all of that? Look at his trial record as far as how many cases he has won. What all has he done for kids, for people in general, for the earth?!
I’m no democrat— but this is one democrat I’ve come to adore. (Sorry to lay it on so thick but he does get trash talked for no good reason. )
Yep, hard to find people that are right on every issue.
I find his book "the real anthony fauci" very informative. Painful to read in one sitting, though. Kindle says I'm about 70% through.
I'll cut RFK jr some slack for his misinformed view of CAGW.
This makes me physically ill in knowing that we are feeding kids this junk. I am not a fan of public schools for a plethora of reasons, and this is just another example of how they continue to fail children.
Having served in Africa years ago, there wasn’t a lot of money and yet we spent time ensuring kids would receive proper nutrition and the highest quality we could afford. That was the priority of people in charge who deeply cared and as a result they selected the best for the kids. Shouldn’t this be the expectation for the country that basically leads the world?
This is a systemic symptom of a very sick system. The government is absolutely accountable for the chemicals they have continued to permit in foods. Those in leadership positions should be ashamed. The lunches they approve for children are a trickle down of the gross failure they continue to operate under.
How do we change this? I mean really change this? I’ve been reading articles like this for years. I’ve seen lunches they serve in Europe and my heart breaks in knowing that children here have to eat this ‘garbage’. It is time parents demanded better for their children, our future!
Sorry...they call that food? Bet Mr. Gates would swoon over that tray of fakery!! Barf!
Go Zach Bush, Go Ronnie Cummins, Go Joel Salatin!
Another idea: Stop vaxxing pets so much. There are REAMS of proof showing injection-site tumors, skyrocketing upticks in cancers and autoimmune diseases in pets and livestock (just like humans!) and all sorts of issues at least in part due to the chemical toxins in vax. White coats say it’s fine but OTHER white coats say it isn’t. YOUR job as a pet and livestock owner is to listen to BOTH and decide FOR YOURSELF which white coat seems better read, better researched and better informed of the actual vaccine issues.
In the meantime, guess which animals never have injection site tumors, a huge uptick in cancers (or none at all), a huge uptick in autoimmune diseases? The wild ones we DON’T vaccinate. Kids and animals do NOT need the level chemical
of toxins, heavy metals, aluminum, and polysorbate 80, which breaches the BLOOD BRAIN BARRIER and carrie’s in other chemicals from the shots, like mercury. Breaching the BBB is seldom a good idea. openvaers.com
VAERS is rubbish. OpenVAERS doubly so.
You might as well get your news on Infowars.
Bless your (most likely myocarditis-riddled) heart.
It's in find condition, but thank you for your unkind concern. It shows the sort of person you are far more clearly than if you'd tried to refute the evidence I've shown.
Of course, IF you can, please do. I'm happy to admit when I'm wrong. Unlike NGOs that want to push a narrative.
And if by “evidence you’ve shown” means typing that openvaers.com is rubbish, I think a looking up the definition of ‘evidence’ is a good idea.
It isn’t that I don’t care. I’m heartbroken for all the people who didn’t research, and swallowed the BOUGHT and paid for main stream misleadia. It’s sad and heartbreaking, literally and emotionally. Hearts are truly BROKEN. I have this on hood authority from a heart nurse T a prestigious hospital near me. She’s never seen anything like it— all the younger men coming in with OLD MAN heart problems. ALL vaxxed, the more times, the worse it is. She’s had a dozen drop dead playing sports, playing video games! Their moms in there, bawling, their twin brothers or friends in there worried sick— again, literally. It’s BAD. The all cause mortality charts clearly show that deaths have gone through the roof in all age groups, especially the 18-50+ year olds, presumably the ones most likely to have been pushed to get the clot shots for work.
So I DO feel bad for you but I am a girl who calls a spade a spade. Best to know now, if you aren’t a bot, and you’ve had the vax, the more you e had, the more
likely
you are to suffer myocarditis or peri. Either way, your life expectancy is shorter than it was prior to the clot shots. But by all means, spend that shortened life telling me how openvaers.com is useless.
How, in the name of computer programming do you think you could have a conversation in this sort of detail with some AI? I co-wrote a book about this in 2015 and everything we predicted then has come true and the claims we debunked then are still debunked and demonstrably so too now.
Have you ever interacted with a bot? I have - many, many times. They give themselves away in subtle ways although they are getting better.
Writing and debunking the sort of nonsense here has been a mission for me for over a decade now. I don't even have to hide behind the name of a band. You can find me easily enough and have a conversation outside of the closed walls of this lunacy.
Come talk with the professionals I work with - many of them virologists, medical doctors, cancer specialists and so on.
I don't know how old you are, but I know that I owe my life to vaccines and in all likelihood, so do you. My RHR is in the high 50s and my BP is normal but that's because I have an active lifestyle. I need it to flush all the crap I have to sift through on sites like this.
You call a spade a spade? Really? Do you know what Dunning-Kruger syndrome is? You're demonstrating a clear and present case of it right now and you're nearing the peak in a sort of Sisyphean fashion.
Like I said, I'm easy to find on Twitter and Facebook but beware if you come after me there, you'd better come prepared because we don't take prisoners where bad information is presented.
That's how Seneff and many others have had their accounts removed or restricted.
America is full to the brim with young men showing old man issues -because you're almost all clinically obese and in most cases morbid or super morbidly obese. Those things destroy your body far faster than a vaccine can. Of course, if you know anything at all about human biology (in particular that lipid cells produce inflammation markers (adipocytokines) that play havoc with our bodies.
The thing is these things are (a) natural and (b) accepted as part of your right to eat until you're ready to burst. Those are the people most likely to die from C19. Or people with blood type A+ because (we, and I'm one of them) match the C19 attack vector more effectively.
But sure, go find a bot who can use words like that in context, and against your claims - one that doesn't need to use ad hominem to put you down.
Go on, I dare you - because if you can prove it, I'll print this page out and eat my own words on video.
I don’t think a huge uptick in “old man heart issues” from young men is on account being overweight. I seriously doubt weight has skyrocketed enough to move the needle this much. And if it had, wouid it not affect as many girls/young women? Would there not be roughly
equal amounts of skyrocketing myocarditis rates in girls/women? And would there not be equal numbers of athletes of both sexes dying on the files of play? This figure has gone up exponentially from roughly 17 per year to 600+. These are primarily very fit and athletic men. They are not sloppy fat nor trying to eat themselves to death. This figure is disconcerting.
You did not address the fact that VAERS is an instrument of the CDC/FDA. You’re far more concerned with whether a bit can be as articulate as you see yourself. Fine! You’re more
articulate than a bot, perhaps. I do not know nor do I care what all a bot may be capable of nor will I ever be, though my son is currently studying AI in college. I know next to nothing about any of its limitations though I’m sure he would be happy to fill me in.
Nonetheless, VAERS IS still a tool
of the CDC/FDA, and it is still somehwat used by them and they would still be crazy NOT to have any sort of tool for obtaining and learning from post-market vaccine data. It is still a huge need and a very insightful learning tool, even given its many flaws. It is not “rubbish”, as you claim. Nor is it needless. When vax have been recalled through the years, based on data— submitted by individuals OR doctors, it is important. It helps get late in the vax trials info to people with the power to make life or death situations less likely to cause more deaths. This “rubbish” was the reason one vax was pulled after killing “only” 53 people. It is very similar to England’s Yellow Card system. Other nations have similar tools/systems.
This begs the question, whether you think England’s and Germany/ and Denmark’s similar systems
are also rubbish or whether you just think ours in particular is rubbish? Either way, it doesn’t really matter, though in my estimation it matters quite a bit more than whether a bot can do backflips.
I don’t care enough one way or other who you are or what you’d like me
to prove, nor do I have an urge
to watch you eat anything on video.
No one here is “hiding behind a band”. My initials are KC and I like the sunshine. Your suppositions regarding me are off.
What else…?
Oh, I have a great number of
professionals, doctors, researchers, pharmacists, nurses, lawyers, statistical experts, authors, CDC whistleblowers, and vaccine injured children/people, their parents and friends, people who have an enormous amount of both professional and real life experience on this side of the fence. I am
not going to convince you, nor are you going to convince me. A spade is a spade and this is a waste of time and effort. Idk what “the powers that be” plan to blame the sudden uptick in all-cause mortality and actuarial charts showing all this death on, but I’m sure they’ll think of something. https://twitter.com/julianne_wiley/status/1567313697625841664
Here’s what VAERS is, ( and OPENVAERS.com is simply
a more user friendly version if you simply want to access records rather than dive deeply into it or load (yet another) vax reaction into it:
It is a TOOL, an INSTRUMENT of the FDA/CDC for the purpose of seeing red flags not picked up during the primary testing and reactive phase of the trials. The reactions have led to the complete removal of “safe & effective” shots over the years on more than one occasion.
This is a smart tool, and frankly, if they DIDN’T have this tool in place, they would be idiots. They are a bunch of scam artists as it is but if they had ZERO post-market safety reporting / data gathering, there would be an outcry (from anyone with any sense) regarding why not.
Furthermore, they still USE this instrument— somewhat, so if you think it’s rubbish, you’ll need to take that up with them, or else figure out a better method of obtaining data from
post-market vaccine use and share your new method with them. I’m sure we’d all be grateful.
In the meantime, the results are in and it isn’t pretty. If YOU complied, and you aren’t a BOT, good luck.
I know what it is... which is why it's rubbish for people like you and the folks at OpenVAERS to use because you're not qualified to sift the data. You just pull a number out and go "OOOOOOOO!"
I know that the FDA uses it and you know what they've found? These vaccines have very low actual rates of adverse effects.
We know from Europe that the "monkey" based vaccine that the Russians stole to make Sputnik that there are a small number of people who got sick and some died from clotting effects. What's this? Am I admitting vaccination isn't perfect? YES, yes I am...
But those same people were at risk of exactly the same clotting events should they contract C19. Of course, people who weren't vaccinated often suffered the same fate.
I don't think it's rubbish as a tool for qualified data analysts, I think (and they've admitted themselves if you bother to read their about pages) that it was never designed for public use. That's the issue I have but where I come from the data isn't submitted in by the cook, the baker and the candlestick maker or the legion of people they get to submit false and misleading reports. I'd hazard a lot of them come from the Soviet Union and china.
Like many of these tools it's been weaponised and used against people like you who are simply too ignorant to know the wool has been pulled right over their entire head.
( . )
Greg Steube, a Republican U.S. Representative from Florida, sent the following letter to FDA Commissioner Robert M. Califf demanding full compliance with laws associated with the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting (VAERS) data. In particular, the FDA has not released their analysis of the VAERS data ordered by a Federal judge January 2022. Two other members of Congress - Rep. Michael Cloud (R-Texas) and Rep. Tom Tiffany (R-Wis.) also signed the letter.
A note on the VAERS system. VAERS is “the nation's early warning system that monitors the safety of vaccines after they are authorized or licensed for use by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).” Historically, VAERS is thought to under report adverse events. VAERS currently has over 1.4 million reports of adverse events after the administration of the COVID-19 vaccines.
You know what else it says (and I'm quoting here):
"VAERS is not designed to determine if a vaccine caused a health problem..."
Read that again and them explain to me why you don't understand the difference between passive and active tracking. Go on, I'll wait.
since VAERS is run by the FDA and CDC, what would you propose they use instead to signal a problem with an injection. Why is this injection not approved by the FDA yet?
That's not the issue with VAERS per se. The problem is two-fold. One that any idiot can file a report (and yes, I mean fake ones) and the other is that most people are not data scientists.
People either use a raw count which is meaningless or find clusters which are also meaningless.
Actual random data can throw patterns and the trick is to know how to see the real patterns from the random ones. For example, recorded noise from outer space can, occasionally, produce sequences that sound like voices. But they're just noise that our brain interprets that way.
This is as much of an art as it is a science.
As for the FDA approval, I'm confused as to why doctors would be even allowed to dose a patient with a non-approved drug so perhaps you would care to elucidate on that point.
I asked two questions.
Are you saying the FDA is incompetent?
The mRNA injections by Pfizer, Janssen and Moderna are not approved by the FDA. They are authorized for emergency use (experimental). You should know the difference since you claim to be a science writer.
RealNotRare.com
DIED SUDDENLY on FB
openvaers.com
leading cause of death in the US ? hmmm
I know a bunch of people who wouldn’t feed their kids that stuff if you paid them.
*Beef/soy tacos I bet.
You are a rock star!!! Keep it up!
They just want us sick, tired, obese and barely alive. That’s it. That’s what they want. Anything delivered by any state agent or the establishment should be rejected wholesale.
Given the deeply entrenched criminality of the federal "regulatory" bureaucracy, it's probably going to be most effective to tackle this and a host of similar problems with all sorts of environmental toxins at the state level. Given the hold that the manufacturers and users of toxic chemicals generally, including Big Ag and Big Food, have over politicians in both major parties, it's probably going to require the kind of referenda that have been used in very many states now to override the DEA's classification of cannabis as a Schedule 1 drug when their bought-and-paid-for state legislatures refused to take action. Each state could simply make it illegal to sell any food that contains more than the miniscule level of glyphosate that can be found even in organically grown food due to unavoidable environmental pollution. It will be important to explicitly define "acceptable" levels of contamination within the law itself, because if that determination is left up to the entrenched state "health" bureaucracy, in most cases the numbers they come up with will be absurdly high, likely by orders of magnitude.
Really concerning.
They're creating the generations of happy big pharma customers. These people are sick and evil. They have managed to poison everything, EVERYTHING! Without customers, big pharma can't not make $$$$.
I have not been able to consume anything with wheat or oats since 1997 apart from when I lived in Spain and only purchased from our local village bakery.
In UK I had been incorrectly diagnosed as Coeliac, but when my doctor in Spain ran the correct tests she found that I am not Coeliac and suggested that I may be reacting to glyphosate.
Upon returning to live in UK I was intrigued to find out that my MEP had volunteered to be tested for glyphosate and despite being a very careful vegan she tested positive for glyphosate and was really unimpressed.
Nothing ever came of it though.....
That company, Monsanto (now Bayer), needs to be forced to withdraw their product from the market but there is no political will to challenge Big P-Harma.
"All of the school lunch samples also contained heavy metals, some at levels up to 6,293 times higher than the EPA’s maximums allowed in drinking water."
Have you ANY idea the effect that cadmium, lead or other heavy elements have on the human body at that sort of exposure? ANY AT ALL?
Someone has been playing with the figures because just 10x EPA safe levels are enough to produce life-altering toxic effects in a foetus. 100x would likely result in death but it's been a while since I looked at the figures so I'd have to check.
As should you before you repeated such utter nonsense. I'm beginning to think America gives out PhDs in lucky bags. This is an utter disgrace.
"How do we get this poison out of the food supply?"
Here's a thought. Are you a plant Jennifer?
I mean if you are, I'd understand your concern. How about a bacteria? No.
OK then - so in that case glyphosate isn't toxic to you so why are you using inflated figures from a pressure group?
Would you like me to list some of the actual poisons in our food supply? Because I can and there are plenty of them but in most cases our bodies just simply don't absorb them due to the size of the molecules and the fact they are not broken down and just pass harmlessly through.
Those that do get through are filtered out by the kidneys - that's their job as you well know.
At least you would do if you had a degree in something related to human physiology. We know Zen Honeycutt, as pretty and charismatic as she is, doesn't.
The real poison in the world today is this sort of nonsense pushed by people with advanced degrees who should damn well know better!
No agency in the world has found a definitive connection between NHL and glyphosate. Suggestions yes, but there are other explanations and clearly you have zero clue about what you're spouting. As a journalist your readers deserve to hear facts, not something you dredged up from Moms Across America or Stefanie Seneff (who, similarly) is not qualified to opine on this and has been banned from Twitter. Presumably for her dangerous stances on vaccination.
Coffee is an endocrine disrupter. So is alcohol - so is lack of sleep for heaven's sake. How dare you come on the Internet, blow smoke in the air about your Ph.D and your other qualifications and then talk complete and utter nonsense.
If it were down to me (and you lived in a my area where this happens) you would likely lose your Ph.D and the right to call yourself doctor. Because we take this sort of stuff seriously, unlike your precious First Amendment that is actually tearing America apart at the seams now.
My goodness. You are an awful person. Are you paid to do this?
Frances, governments love this type of person who will just stir up dissent with the "others". Who is he yelling at?
This person is a science writer with over 40 years of experience an you are... some random dude on the Internet.
I have more than 40 years experience and huge hairy balls. :)
Wow that added to the argument.
But I do have huge hairy balls, so you got that right.
Published much Mabai?
I wasn't talking about you
My goodness Frances. You are an awful person. Are you paid to do this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now how does that feel? This is what's called an "Ad Hominem" attack (same as the one Mabal uses below).
I don't actually think you're an awful person, I don't know you. And even if you were John Wayne Gacey that wouldn't matter. What matters is the logic. If you argue that a wheel is round (in response to someone saying that it's square) then you'd be right. Even if you were the most despised person in the world, no one can really deny that the wheel is round. Or that the Earth is basically a very large sphere.
Now does what you said that attack the central point of my arguments? Do you have any evidence to suggest I'm paid (I'm not, but that's beside the point.)
Did you even read the arguments? You know that Jennifer's PhD is not a science doctorate right? And even if it was it would have to be in one of several fairly narrow fields.
I follow the e-v-i-d-e-n-c-e! I use multiple sources who I can verify are not NGOs and not in the pocket of Big Chem.
Jennifer's source has long been show to be faulty as MAA failed to detail the type of assay they used to detect the presence of glyphosate. I know this because I've been involved with this particular problem for, gosh, almost nine years now.
Now of course, if either of you wish to pick out and point of what I've said you take issue with, I'd be happy to discuss it. We don't have to wave our expertise around even though this is my field, I'm always happy to be corrected if I err on a point of fact.
One of my professors made an error (which I repeated, ugh) about the amount of CO2 released from a volcanic eruption some years back. I was rightly roasted and rapidly corrected that assertion.
That's the difference between a scientist and Joe Bloggs the Barfly.
"Jennifer's source has long been show to be faulty as MAA failed to detail the type of assay they used to detect the presence of glyphosate. I know this because I've been involved with this particular problem for, gosh, almost nine years now." - thank you. Now I see why you are so sneery. Your comments are bristling with ad hominem but you don't want us to notice that. Sorry, we did.
Your comments have no supporting studies.
You are Joe Bloggs the Barfly without them.
Ciao chump.
How is that ad hominem? Show me where I attack the person, not the argument. If I did that, then that's on me. But I find the repetition of results that are (a) wrong an (b) wouldn't matter even IF they were correct because like I've said, unless you are a plant or a bacterium, glyphosate has ZERO effect on our bodies. None. If we assail them with huge amounts over a large amount of time (say two teaspoons of prepared salt per day for two years) the equivalent of the rat study that's recently come out, the some will cross the blood brain barrier.
Jennifer's SOURCE. Not Jennifer and this is my wheelhouse.
My comments have numerous supporting studies, not that you would bother going to look them up. All that Jennifer and so many like her are doing is trying to cripple farmers across the Western world by pushing bad and faulty science. Even Farron Cousins recently went on a rant about earthworms when the study use nematodes which are not even closely related animals.
Why not go back to the source (Moms Across America) and examine their source. Ask to see the assay and the methodology used.
But what's REALLY glaring here is Jennifer is too cowardly to take ME on, so she simply relied on you guys to come and complain that I'm been mean.
Well yeah, I'm angry. I'm angry that my food costs more because of this sort of thing. I can hardly afford to eat as it is, but this sort of idiocy only benefits the rich.